​​​

This service is designed for investors and management teams who want to understand what worked—and what didn’t—after a deal has closed. We revisit original models, compare them with actual performance, and identify issues in valuation logic, diligence scope, or integration execution.
 

Our Post-M&A review includes:

• Model vs. Reality: Gayzer compares forecasted and actual revenue, margins, and cash flow to pinpoint gaps in the deal thesis.

• Valuation Assumption Testing: We examine whether original assumptions—growth, churn, synergy, pricing—were realistic and why they may have diverged.

• Diligence Coverage Gaps: We highlight risks that were overlooked, under-analyzed, or surfaced post-closing.

• Organizational Fit & Integration Friction: We assess whether the acquired company was truly aligned with the buyer’s operating model.

• Report: A structured, honest analysis that improves future dealmaking—especially for serial acquirers.
   

In cases where our assessment reveals serious mismatches or overlooked issues, Gayzer prepares a formal expert report—including full financial analysis designed to be shared with all relevant stakeholders.
 

If such findings point to a potential dispute, Gayzer coordinates with legal counsel to help the client structure the necessary next steps—including preparation for arbitration or litigation, where applicable.